jQuery .size() vs .length vs [0]

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 10 of this test case created by

Preparation code

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<p>asd asd</p>
<p>asd asd</p>
<p>asd asd</p>
<p>asd asd</p>
<p>asd asd</p>
<p>asd asd</p>
<p>asd asd</p>
<p>asd asd</p>
<script>
  var $selector = $('p');
</script>
    

Preparation code output

<p>asd asd</p> <p>asd asd</p> <p>asd asd</p> <p>asd asd</p> <p>asd asd</p> <p>asd asd</p> <p>asd asd</p> <p>asd asd</p>

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in CCBot 2.0.0 / Other 0.0.0
Test Ops/sec
size()
$selector.size();
pending…
[0]
$selector[0];
pending…
.length
$selector.length
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.

0 Comments

asd asd

asd asd

asd asd

asd asd

asd asd

asd asd

asd asd

asd asd