native vs typed js array speed

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 80 of this test case created by

Preparation code

<script>
  var arraySize = 4;
  
  var typedArray = new Int32Array(4 * arraySize);
  var nativeArray = new Array(arraySize);
</script>
      
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
  var sum = 0;

};
</script>

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in CCBot 2.0.0 / Other 0.0.0
Test Ops/sec
Native array
//Write
for (var i = arraySize; i; i--) {
 nativeArray[i] = i;
}

//Read
for (var i = arraySize; i; i--) {
 sum += nativeArray[i];
}
pending…
Typed array
//Write
for (var i = 0; i < arraySize; ++i) {
 typedArray[i] = i;
}

//Read
for (var i = 0; i < arraySize; ++i) {
 sum += typedArray[i];
}
pending…
Native forward fill
//Write
for (var i = 0; i < arraySize; i++) {
 nativeArray[i] = i;
}

//Read
for (var i = 0; i < arraySize; i++) {
 sum += nativeArray[i];
}
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.

0 Comments