jQuery .find() vs. context selector

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 60 of this test case created by

Preparation code

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script>

<article>
<p>A test</p>
<p><iframe id="test" class="test"></iframe></p>
<p>This is text</p>
</article>

      
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
  var article = document.querySelector('article');

};
</script>

Preparation code output

<article> <p>A test</p> <p><iframe id="test" class="test"></iframe></p> <p>This is text</p> </article>

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in CCBot 2.0.0 / Other 0.0.0
Test Ops/sec
find method
var hasFrame = !!$(article).find('iframe');
pending…
context method
var hasFrame = !!$('iframe', article);
pending…
pure DOM api - getElementsByTagName
var hasFrame = !!article.getElementsByTagName('iframe');
pending…
id pick
var hasFrame = !!document.getElementById('test');
pending…
id pick2
var hasFrame = !!$('#test');
pending…
QuerySelectorAll
var hasFrame = !!article.querySelectorAll('iframe');
pending…
QuerySelectorAll w/ id
var hasFrame = !!article.querySelectorAll('#test');
pending…
pure DOM api - getElementsByClassName
var hasFrame = !!article.getElementsByClassName('.test');
pending…
QuerySelectorAll w/ class
var hasFrame = !!article.querySelectorAll('.test');
pending…
jQuery Class Select
var hasFrame = !!$('.test');
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.

0 Comments

A test

This is text