for vs for not cached

JavaScript performance comparison

Test case created by pop

Preparation code

<script>
  var i = 0; 
  var j = 0;
  var arr = {
    length: 10000
  };
  var len;
</script>
    

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in CCBot 2.0.0 / Other 0.0.0
Test Ops/sec
for
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
 j += i;
}
pending…
for not cached
for (i = 0, j = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) {
 j += i;
}
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.

0 Comments