Closure Prototype Static Performance

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 12 of this test case created by

Preparation code


      
      <script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
  function X() {};
  
  X.prototype.message = function(s) {
    var mymessage = s + "";
  };
  
  X.prototype.addition = function(i, j) {
    return (i * 2 + j * 2) / 2;
  };
  
  function Y() {
    this.message = function(s) {
      var mymessage = s + "";
    }
  
    this.addition = function(i, j) {
      return (i * 2 + j * 2) / 2;
    }
  };
  
  Z = {
    message: function(s) {
      var mymessage = s + "";
    },
  
    addition: function(i, j) {
      return (i * 2 + j * 2) / 2;
    }
  };
  
  
  /* Cached Functions */
  var _message = function(s) {
    var mymessage = s + "";
  }
  
  var _addition = function(i, j) {
    return (i * 2 + j * 2) / 2;
  }
  
  function A() {
    this.message = _message;
    this.addition = _addition;
  };
  
  y = new Y();
  x = new X();
  z = Z;
  a = new A();

};
</script>

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in CCBot 2.0.0 / Other 0.0.0
Test Ops/sec
Closure
y.message("hi");
y.addition(1, 2);
pending…
Prototype
x.message("hi");
x.addition(1, 2);
pending…
Static
z.message("hi");
z.addition(1, 2);
pending…
Closure with cached functions
a.message("hi");
a.addition(1, 2);
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.

0 Comments