chrome-sorting

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 2 of this test case created by

Preparation code

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/1.2.1/lodash.js">
</script>
<script>
  var lodash = _.noConflict();
</script>
      
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
  var _ = window.lodash;
  var as1 = [],
      as2 = [];
  var a1 = [],
      a2 = [];
  var ar1 = [],
      ar2 = [];
  var i, j, s = [],
      r;
  var size = 800;
  
  for (i = 0; i < size; i = i + 1) {
  
    for (j = 0; j < 12; j = j + 1) {
  
      r = _.random(0, 255);
  
      s[j] = String.fromCharCode(r);
    }
  
    as1[i] = s.join('');
    a1[i] = s.join('');
  }
  
  as1.sort();
  as2 = _.cloneDeep(as1);
  a2 = _.cloneDeep(a1);
  
  ar1 = as1.reverse();
  ar2 = _.cloneDeep(ar1);

};
</script>

Preparation code output

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in CCBot 2.0.0 / Other 0.0.0
Test Ops/sec
sorted
x1 = [];
x2 = [];
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {

  x1[i] = as1[i];
  x2[i] = as2[i];
}

x1.sort();
x2.sort();

for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
  if (x1[i] !== x2[i]) {

    break;
  }
}
pending…
reverse sorted
x1 = [];
x2 = [];
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {

  x1[i] = ar1[i];
  x2[i] = ar2[i];
}

x1.sort();
x2.sort();

for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
  if (x1[i] !== x2[i]) {

    break;
  }
}
pending…
random
x1 = [];
x2 = [];
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {

  x1[i] = a1[i];
  x2[i] = a2[i];
}

x1.sort();
x2.sort();

for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
  if (x1[i] !== x2[i]) {

    break;
  }
}
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.

0 Comments