Underscore templates - classic vs. precompiled
JavaScript performance comparison
Info
Benchmarking difference in performance of rendering simple Underscore template - classic vs. precompiled
Preparation code
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/1.0.0-rc.2/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script>
var lodash = _.noConflict();
</script>
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
var _ = window.lodash;
var template = '<div class="item <%= id %>">' +
' <h1><%= title %></h1>' +
' <p><%= desc %></p>' +
' <ul class="attributes">' +
' <li><%= attrs.dimensions %></li>' +
' <li><%= attrs.weight %></li>' +
' <li><%= attrs.price %></li>' +
' </ul>' +
'</div>';
var templateFuncPrecompiled = eval("(" + _.template(template).source + ")");
};
</script>
Preparation code output
Test runner
Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)
Java applet disabled.
| Test | Ops/sec | |
|---|---|---|
classic |
|
pending… |
precompiled |
|
pending… |
Compare results of other browsers
Revisions
You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:
- Revision 1: published
- Revision 2: published
- Revision 3: published by Dave
- Revision 4: published by Andrei Zharau
- Revision 5: published
- Revision 6: published
- Revision 7: published
0 comments