typeString vs toType
JavaScript performance comparison
Preparation code
<script>
var toString = {}.toString;
function typeString (v) {
return v == null ? String(v) : toString.call(v).slice(8, -1);
}
function toType(obj) {
return obj == null ? String(obj) : ({}).toString.call(obj).match(/\s([a-z|A-Z]+)/)[1]
}
</script>
Test runner
Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)
Java applet disabled.
| Test | Ops/sec | |
|---|---|---|
typeString |
|
pending… |
toType |
|
pending… |
Compare results of other browsers
Revisions
You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:
- Revision 1: published
- Revision 2: published
- Revision 3: published
0 comments