Three.js closure vs. pre-allocated

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 6 of this test case created by Matt Lockyer

Preparation code

<script src="https://raw.github.com/mrdoob/three.js/master/build/three.min.js"></script>
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
    var A = new THREE.Vector3();
    var B = new THREE.Vector3();
    var C = new THREE.Vector3();
   
    function setFromCoplanarPoints1(a, b, c) {
      var normal = THREE.Plane.__v1.sub(c, b).crossSelf(
        THREE.Plane.__v2.sub(a, b)).normalize();
      return normal;
    }
   
    var setFromCoplanarPoints2 = (function() {
      var v1 = new THREE.Vector3();
      var v2 = new THREE.Vector3();
      return function(a, b, c) {
        var normal = v1.sub(c, b).crossSelf(v2.sub(a, b)).normalize();
        return normal;
      };
    })();
   
    var random = [];
    for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      random.push(Math.random());
    }
   
    var nextRandom = 0;
};
</script>

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in unknown unknown
Test Ops/sec
Pre-allocated
var i = nextRandom;
A.set(random[i++], random[i++], random[i++]);
B.set(random[i++], random[i++], random[i++]);
C.set(random[i++], random[i++], random[i++]);
var tmp = setFromCoplanarPoints1(A, B, C);

nextRandom = i % (random.length - 100);
pending…
Closure
var i = nextRandom;
A.set(random[i++], random[i++], random[i++]);
B.set(random[i++], random[i++], random[i++]);
C.set(random[i++], random[i++], random[i++]);
var tmp = setFromCoplanarPoints2(A, B, C);

nextRandom = i % (random.length - 100);
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:

0 comments

Add a comment