regexp vs indexOf

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 7 of this test case created

Info

Checking the performance cost of using a regexp instead of String#indexOf.

Preparation code

<div id="foo" class="a foo bar"></div>
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
    var r;
    var element = document.getElementById('foo');
    var reContains = /foo/;
    var strContains = 'foo';
   
    function dynamicRegExp(node) {
      return RegExp('foo').test(node.className);
    }
   
    function inlineRegExp(node) {
      return /foo/.test(node.className);
    }
   
    function storedRegExp(node) {
      return reContains.test(node.className);
    }
   
    function stringIndexOf(node) {
      return node.className.indexOf('foo') > -1;
    }
   
    function storedStringIndexOf(node) {
      return node.className.indexOf(strContains) > -1;
    }
   
};
</script>

Preparation code output

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in unknown unknown
Test Ops/sec
dynamic regexp
r = dynamicRegExp(element);
pending…
inline regexp
r = inlineRegExp(element);
pending…
stored regexp
r = storedRegExp(element);
pending…
string indexOf
r = stringIndexOf(element);
pending…
stored string indexOf
r = storedStringIndexOf(element);
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:

1 comment

John-David Dalton commented :

The point of this test is to show that you should avoid making blanket assumptions about performance and that you shouldn't fear the RegExp :)

I wanted to use a common use case of checking if an element has a specific class name because I've seen libs toss-n-turn over using one or the other.

This revision is less representative of the use case as now it will match className values like 'foobar' instead of just 'foo'.

Add a comment