Minified for-loops

JavaScript performance comparison

Test case created by Joshua Piccari

Preparation code

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
      var list = [
          "oranges",
          "apples",
          "tangerines",
          "watermelon",
          "nectarines",
          "peaches",
          "strawberries",
          "oranges",
          "apples",
          "tangerines",
          "watermelon",
          "nectarines",
          "peaches",
          "strawberries",
          "oranges",
          "apples",
          "tangerines",
          "watermelon",
          "nectarines",
          "peaches",
          "strawberries",
          "oranges",
          "apples",
          "tangerines",
          "watermelon",
          "nectarines",
          "peaches",
          "strawberries"
      ],
      $script = $('script');
};
</script>

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in unknown unknown
Test Ops/sec
simple for-loop
for(var i=0;i<list.length;i++){$script.text();}
pending…
Cached (outside)
var i=0,len=list.length;for(;i<len;i++){$script.text();}
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:

0 comments

Add a comment