Plain JS

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 5 of this test case created

Info

try to use only JS with DOM function

Preparation code

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script src="//staging-ian.appmobi.com/game/jq.mobi.min.js">
</script>
<script src="//staging-ian.appmobi.com/game/zepto.min.js">
</script>
<div id="container">
</div>

Preparation code output

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in unknown unknown
Test Ops/sec
jQ.Mobi
document.getElementById("container").innerHTML = "";
$ = jq;

var con = jq("#container");
var ul = jq("<ul/>");
var i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
  var li = jq("<li>hello world jq.Mobi</li>");
  ul.append(li);
}
con.append(ul);
pending…
jQuery
document.getElementById("container").innerHTML = "";


var con = jQuery("#container");
var ul = jQuery("<ul/>");
var i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
  var li = jQuery("<li>hello world jQuery</li>");
  ul.append(li);
}
con.append(ul);
pending…
Zepto
document.getElementById("container").innerHTML = "";


var con = Zepto("#container");
var ul = Zepto("<ul/>");
var i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
  var li = Zepto("<li>hello world Zepto</li>");
  ul.append(li);
}
con.append(ul);
pending…
Plain JS
document.getElementById("container").innerHTML = "";


var con = document.getElementById("container");
var ul = document.createElement("ul");
var i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
  var li = document.createElement("li");
  li.innerHTML = "hello world Plain";
  ul.appendChild(li);
}
con.appendChild(ul);
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:

0 comments

Add a comment