jQuery 2.0b VS jQ.Mobi VS zepto VS ten.js

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 103 of this test case created by j79

Info

This is an edited test from http://jsperf.com/jqm3/68 by levin, which is based on some other test.

All I did was add a test for ten.js and remove the native JavaScript tests.

Preparation code

<script src="//zeptojs.com/zepto.min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdn.jqmobi.com/jq.mobi.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.0.0b1.js"></script></script>
<script src="http://lordsnow.net/kvf/ten/ten.min.js"></script>
<div id="container"></div>
<script>
  Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
    var d = {};
    d.id = function(el) {
      return document.getElementById(el);
    }
    d.create = function(el) {
      return document.createElement(el);
    }
    
    //Lets add the append method to all html dom nodes:
    HTMLElement.prototype.append = function(el) {
      this.appendChild(el);
    }
    var container = d.id('container');
    var ul, li, i = 0;
  };

  Benchmark.prototype.teardown = function() {
    container.innerHTML = "";
  };
</script>

Preparation code output

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in unknown unknown
Test Ops/sec
jQ.Mobi
 
ul = jq("<ul/>");
for (; i < 100; i += 1) {
  li = jq("<li>hello world jq.Mobi</li>");
  ul.append(li);
}
jq(d.id('container')).append(ul);
 pending…
jQuery
 
ul = jQuery("<ul/>");
for (; i < 100; i += 1) {
  li = jQuery("<li>hello world jQuery</li>");
  ul.append(li);
}
jQuery(d.id('container')).append(ul);
 pending…
ten.js
 
ul = ten("<ul/>");
for (; i < 100; i += 1) {
  li = ten("<li>hello world ten.js</li>");
  ul.append(li);
}
ten(d.id('container')).append(ul);
 pending…
Zepto
 
ul = Zepto("<ul/>");
for (; i < 100; i += 1) {
  li = Zepto("<li>hello world Zepto</li>");
  Zepto(ul).append(li);
}
Zepto(d.id('container')).append(ul);
 pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:

1 comment

Jeremy Harris commented : ∞

In my test results, jQ.Mobi showed "56,529" ops/sec, but ten.js says it took the lead at "55,357". I don't think this is accurate... Looks like jQ.Mobi (Intel's App Framework) took the lead.

"Testing in Chrome 26.0.1410.64 on Windows Server 2008 R2 / 7"

Add a comment