Render Template From DOM Select vs Cache vs HTML Cache
JavaScript performance comparison
Info
This test was spawned by some discussion in a StackOverflow thread:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9833312/how-do-i-properly-store-a-javascript-template-so-that-it-isnt-instantiated-mul
The purpose is to test the speed of rendering an underscore.js template when selecting the template from the DOM every time, vs selecting it once and re-rendering the cached template every time.
Preparation code
<script id="test-template" type="text/template">
< p > this is < div class = "foo" > some html < /div>
</p > < ul > < li > with data < li > and items < li > etc < /ul>
</script>
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script src="//documentcloud.github.com/underscore/underscore-min.js">
</script>
<div id="html-output-goes-here">
</div>
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
this.cachedItem = $("#test-template");
this.cachedHtml = this.cachedItem.html()
this.cachedTemplate = _.template(this.cachedHtml);
this.output = $("#html-output-goes-here");
};
Benchmark.prototype.teardown = function() {
delete this.cachedItem;
delete this.cachedTemplate;
};
</script>
Preparation code output
Test runner
Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)
Java applet disabled.
| Test | Ops/sec | |
|---|---|---|
Template-Cached |
|
pending… |
Non-Cached |
|
pending… |
DOM-Item-Cached |
|
pending… |
Html-Cached |
|
pending… |
Compare results of other browsers
Revisions
You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:
- Revision 1: published by Derick Bailey
- Revision 2: published by Jay Cox
- Revision 3: published
- Revision 4: published
- Revision 7: published
- Revision 8: published by jschell12
- Revision 9: published
0 comments