Browser Diet - jQuery.each vs. for loop

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 63 of this test case created

Preparation code

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://rawgit.com/SerkanSipahi/liyajs/master/liya.js">
</script>
<script>
  var a = $('*').get(),
      $nativeDomNodes = document.querySelectorAll('*'),
      e;
</script>

Preparation code output

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in unknown unknown
Test Ops/sec
jQuery.each
$.each(a, function() {
  e = this;
})
pending…
for loop
for (var i = 0, len = a.length; i < len; i++) {
  e = a[i];
}
pending…
for without caching
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
  e = a[i];
}
pending…
alternative for loop
for (var i in a) {
  e = a[i];
}
pending…
reverse for
for (var i = a.length; i--;) {
  e = a[i];
}
pending…
while reverse
var i = a.length;
while (i) {
  e = a[--i]
}
pending…
for in
function arrayForEach(array, action) {
  for (var i = 0, j = array.length; i < j; i++)
    action(array[i], i);
}

arrayForEach(a, function(item) {
  e = item;
});
pending…
liya.each
liya.each($nativeDomNodes, function(){
  e = this;
});
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:

0 comments

Add a comment