Underscore bind vs jQuery.proxy vs Lo-Dash bind

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 61 of this test case created by evilive

Preparation code

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.6.0/underscore-min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/2.4.1/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script>
var lodash = _.noConflict();

var _bind = _.bind(function(x) {return this + x}, 1);
var lodashbind = lodash.bind(function(x) {return this + x}, 1);
var nativebind = function(x) {return this + x}.bind(1);
var jquerybind = jQuery.proxy(function(x) {return this + x}, 1);

</script>
 

Preparation code output

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in unknown unknown
Test Ops/sec
Underscore bind
_bind(1);
pending…
jQuery.proxy
jquerybind(1);
pending…
Lo-Dash bind
lodashbind(1);
pending…
Native bind  
nativebind(1);
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:

0 comments

Add a comment