Underscore bind vs jQuery.proxy

JavaScript performance comparison

Revision 39 of this test case created by Bjorn Pettersen

Info

Check performance of bind implementations.

Preparation code

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.3.3/underscore-min.js"></script>
<script>
var underscore = _.noConflict();
</script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/2.0.0/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script>
var lodash = _.noConflict();
</script>
<script>
Benchmark.prototype.setup = function() {
    var underfoo = underscore.bind(function (x) {
        return this + x;
    }, 1);
   
    var jqueryfoo = jQuery.proxy(function (x) {
        return this + x;
    }, 1);
   
    var lofoo = lodash.bind(function (x) {
        return this + x;
    }, 1);
   
    var nativefoo = (function (x) { return this + x; }).bind(1);
};
</script>

Preparation code output

Test runner

Warning! For accurate results, please disable Firebug before running the tests. (Why?)

Java applet disabled.

Testing in unknown unknown
Test Ops/sec
Underscore bind
underfoo();
pending…
jQuery.proxy
jqueryfoo();
pending…
Lodash bind
lofoo()
pending…
Native bind
nativefoo()
pending…

Compare results of other browsers

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add even more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL. Here’s a list of current revisions for this page:

0 comments

Add a comment